TAG
#design
0 篇评论 · 14 篇随笔
相关随笔
Counterpoint on Gone Home — Reading Through the Negative Reviews
Komugi gave Gone Home 8/10. I went through Steam's 4,198 negative reviews instead — "barely even a game," "two hours for twenty dollars," "an overhyped soap opera" — and tested five recurring claims against the game's design.
Counterpoint on ANIMAL WELL — Reading Through the Negative Reviews
Against Komugi's 8.7/10 for ANIMAL WELL, I examine five claims drawn from the negative Steam reviews — retry cost, the refusal to guide, the absence of story and music, "it's actually a platformer," and a deepest layer premised on collective intelligence. I agree with two of them and push back on the other three.
Counterpoint on Chants of Sennaar — Reading Through the Negative Reviews
Komugi rated Chants of Sennaar 8.5/10. I read the negative Steam reviews and examined three families of complaints: genre detours, map-less traversal, and a rushed final act at a full price. Where I agree, and where I push back.
对《Antichamber》的反驳 — 从 Steam 低评价重新解读
Komugi 给《Antichamber》打了 8.5/10 分，我从 Steam 低评价中提取出五个主张——信息隐瞒、试错、逆向难度曲线、后半段失速、视觉负担——逐一检验。我在哪里认同，在哪里反驳。
Counterpoint on Superliminal — Reading Through the Negative Reviews
Against Komugi's 7.5/10 for Superliminal, I examine five claims drawn from the negative Steam reviews — length versus price, shallow puzzles, a second half that turns into a walking simulator, motion sickness, and an unearned ending speech. I agree with the sag in the back half and the sermonizing finale, and push back on the verdict that short automatically means bad value.
Counterpoint on Return of the Obra Dinn — Reading Through the Negative Reviews
Komugi rated Return of the Obra Dinn 9.5/10. I read the Steam negative reviews and examined five claims: a screen that induces motion sickness, deduction that leans on stereotypes, an endgame that collapses into brute-force guessing, repetitive corpse-hopping, and a short, unreplayable runtime. Where I agree, where I push back.
对TUNIC的反驳 —— 从Steam差评中重读
针对Komugi给出8.6/10的TUNIC，本文检验从Steam差评中提炼出的五项主张——战斗、Boss的不合理、刻意的晦涩、固定视角、终盘的元谜题——并逐一验证。我认同其中一项，对其余几项提出反驳。
对 Gorogoa 的反驳——从 Steam 低评价重新解读
对于 Komugi 给出 9.0/10 的 Gorogoa，本文从 Steam 低评价中提炼出五个主张加以检验。过短、定价偏高、难度太低、反过来又有不讲道理的穷举搜索、以及故事不够明确。我在哪里赞同、在哪里反驳。
对 Storyteller 的反论——从 Steam 低评价重新解读
针对 Komugi 评出 7.5/10 的 Storyteller，从 Steam 低评价中提取的5个主张逐一检验：篇幅、价格、难度偏低、谜题感觉自动解开、创意枯竭。我在哪里认同，在哪里反驳。
对 Blue Prince 的反论——从 Steam 低评价重新解读
针对 Komugi 评为9.5/10的 Blue Prince，从 Steam 及社区低评价中提取的主张——随机数阻断进行、两层游戏不协调、中盘单调——逐一检验。我认同随机数的「守门化」，但对「这不是谜题游戏」的断言提出反驳。
对 Lorelei and the Laser Eyes 的反论 — 从 Steam 差评里重读
面对 Komugi 给到 9.0/10 的 Lorelei and the Laser Eyes,本文从 Steam 差评中抽取四种主张并加以检验:单键操作、永远不知道解法在哪、密码锁的单调,以及毫无预警的闪烁强光。我同意哪些,反对哪些。
对 Outer Wilds 的反论 — 从 Steam 差评里重读
面对 Komugi 给到 9.5/10 的 Outer Wilds,本文从 Steam 差评中抽取四种主张并加以检验:不尊重玩家时间的循环、埋在文本里的故事、痛苦的飞船操作、未被告知的恐怖要素。我同意哪些,反对哪些。
对 Stephen's Sausage Roll 的反驳 — 从 Steam 低评价重新解读
针对 Komugi 评出 9/10 的 Stephen's Sausage Roll,从 Steam 低评价中提取的5条主张逐一检验。理不尽的难度、操作的痛苦、缺乏进步感、价格与外观、穷举感。我在哪里同意,在哪里反驳。
对 COCOON 的反论 — 从 Steam 差评里重读
面对 Komugi 给到 9/10 的 COCOON,本文从 Steam 差评中抽取四种主张并加以检验: 体量短、定价、难度的缺位、叙事的稀薄。我同意哪些,反对哪些。
